|
Mast Sanity is calling
for an immediate halt on future Wi-fi installations in schools and
the removal of all current school Wi-fi installations with a switch
back to wired systems.
We call for the application of the precautionary
principle. If Wi-fi is found to be harmful -“ as evidence[0]
in many schools suggests - then we will have sacrificed a generation
of children who are currently continually subjected to the microwave
radiation it emits. Irreversible damage may be done.
Mast Sanity Spokesperson Yasmin Skelt[1],
said "The mad clamour for new technology has raced ahead of
legislation and public health concerns. As Professor Lawrie
Challis, who heads the committee on mobile phone research[2],
stated "Children are much more sensitive than adults to a
number of other dangers" the law should protect children
from unproven technology."
"Professor Alan Preece has stated regarding Wi-fi
"No one is really aware of what we are dealing with. The
Department of Trade and Industry needs to take the lead and do some
investigation"[3]. I absolutely agree but the few
regulations are a mess. The DTI, Ofcom[4] and Ruth
Kelly should act now"
"Seven years ago the Becta[5] Study
which was never published was carried out when wireless systems were
first being installed in schools. The report raised health and safety
questions and reported that some engineers complained of headaches at
the end of the working days. Becta deferred to the Health Protection
Agency[6] on health and safety issues. Well seven years
have gone by and we are still waiting for the HPA to announce on what
it is going to do."[7]
The intensity of radiation received from Wi-fi access
points inside a school will be the same or higher than in the main
beam from a Mobile Phone Mast situated outside a school.
Both the Stewart Report[8] and the newly
discovered German ECOLOG report[10] ( sponsored by
T-Mobile) recommended that the beam of maximum intensity of base
stations ( Mobile Phone Masts) should not fall on ANY part of
a school. This was reiterated in the DfES guidelines[9].
And in the case of the ECOLOG report that emission levels should be
1000 times lower than currently allowed "
especially in areas of sensitivity such as schools.
Yasmin went on to say, "It is a diabolical
situation where the Government will put in guidelines to protect the
outside of a school but refuses to even acknowledge a potential but
marked risk and positively encourages the mass roll-out of an
unnecessary system. Blair might be going but Brown is inheriting a
potential public health nightmare."
Thus Wi-fi should be banned in schools.
END
*** Late Addition ***
Dr. Andrew Goldworthy of Imperial College London is inviting concerned people to contact their MPs - "Who was responsible for the decision not to warn education authorities of the possible dangers of genetic damage from Wi-Fi radiation?"
Notes and References ....
Notes and References:
0. There are now many cases of health problems triggered by Wi-Fi installations in school and elsewhere, for example John Fox (Teacher) , Robert Thinker (Home Owner) , Michael Bevington (Teacher) , Tony (Resident in flat) , Kate Figes (Author) , Ryan Warne (Furniture Worker) , Poppy Rhodes (Journalist) , David Dean (Councillor, London) , Sarah Dacre (former TV Executive) , Brian Stein (Chief Executive) , As previously reported by Mast Sanity and the Times Educational Supplement recently in a BECTA report from 2000, but never published, "some engineers
complained of headaches at the end of the working days". In the Independent on Sunday (13/05/2007) published a letter from yet another sufferer entitled "Wi-Fi headache" it went on to say "I have worked in an IT environment for 20 years, suffering little more than the odd trip-up on trailing cables ("Scientists demand inquiry over Wi-Fi", 29 April). My organisation has used wireless routers on and off for a year. As soon as the device is booted up I sense a searing head pain that can last several hours. Using a mobile also causes headaches. My home network is wired." from David Williams, SALE, CHESHIRE . Additionally, members of Mast Sanity know of several other examples
where people have been made ill by the presence of Wi-fi and have
recovered afterwards. i. A neighbour always ill in various ways over a long period of time
whilst wi-fi was in
the house recovered soon after it was turned off. ii. Family friend, also over a long period, often
had a migraine when sat by the wi-fi router - he recovered when wi-fi
was removed. iii. An ex-colleague who could not
stand to stay in his office when wi-fi was introduced - had to give up
his work there - his reaction was so severe that he is now
electrosensitive and has to avoid all other forms of microwave
emissions. iv. Another member under took a straw poll of parents and
children leaving local school with wi-fi - 1/3 of children were
described as often having headaches, migraines, sleep problems, nose
bleeds and mouth ulcers. None of these symptoms occurred before
Wi-fi
was installed, and all are commonly associated with findings from
research into other comparable forms of microwave radiation. Also everyone who is registered with the charity electrosensitivity will also not be able to go near Wi-fi.
1. Yasmin Skelt was
one of the first members of the public to challenge the government's planning
policy in the now classic case that is often quoted in planning inquiries -
Yasmin Skelt v First Secretary of State and Three Rivers District Council and
Orange PCS Limited.
2. Mobile
Telecommunications and Health Research Programme (MTHR) - http://www.mthr.org.uk/index.htm
3. Independent on
Sunday - 29/4/07 - "Scientists demand inquiry over Wi-fi" - http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/health_medical/article2494225.ece
4. Ofcom is the
independent regulator and competition authority for the UK communications
industries, with responsibilities across television, radio, telecommunications
and wireless communications services. http://www.ofcom.org.uk/
5. Becta - http://www.becta.org.uk/
6. Health
Protection Agency -HPA - Radiation Protection Division - http://www.hpa.org.uk/radiation/default.htm
7. Times Education
Supplement 30 March 2007 Report by
Jonathan Milne http://www.tes.co.uk
8. Independent
Expert Group on Mobile Phones Report - "The Stewart Report" http://www.iegmp.org.uk/ The Stewart Report[8]
S1.42 recommended that.....'the beam
of greatest RF intensity' from a [Mobile Phone Mast] macrocell base station
sited within or near the grounds of a school should not be permitted to fall on
any part of the school's grounds or buildings without agreement from the school
and parents'......
|