Welcome to Mast Sanity

We are the primary national organisation opposing the insensitive siting of mobile phone and Tetra masts in the UK. Read more...

Phone Mast News Feeds

News Now News Now
Google News Google News Feed
Powerwatch Powerwatch News Feed
** New** ES-UK ES-UK News Feed
MS Research Mast Sanity Research News Feed
MS News Mast Sanity News Feed

Donate

Please consider supporting our efforts.

Amount: 

Or Send Donations by post to:

Mast Sanity
c/o Highfields
Brantham Hill,
Manningtree, Essex
CO11 1SD

i Iris Atzmon on John Goldsmiths’ papers

http://omega.twoday.net/stories/1599006/

ii Appendix 1(3) online source : Environmental Health Perspectives

http://www.ehponline.org/docs/1997/Suppl-6/toc.html


iii Sue Webster was quoted in Canceractive’s ICON magazine in January 2003 article

http://www.canceractive.com/shop/product.php?productid=16157&cat=255&page=1

'Sue Webster, a psychotherapist and nutritionist, is the first and only
person to collect evidence from all the 14 UK clusters and visit homes with
an AcousticOM instrument that translates pulsing EMRs into noise. "When I
started out I expected the microwave power levels would be higher in places
where there were a lot of cancers. I have visited hundreds of houses and
found that this is not the case. It's the pulsing that is far more intense
in these houses. My first experience of violent pulsing was in three
Gainsborough houses where four people had cancer. You could hardly hear
yourself speak. These houses were directly opposite and about 100 metres
from a mast which was installed seven years ago with six antennas and two
microwave dishes." There are six other cases of cancer within 200 metres,
including 10 year-old Ryan Petch who has non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma and a 30
year old currently in remission from leukaemia.'

vi http://omega.twoday.net/stories/555926/, scroll down for cluster listing

xv Abdel Rassoul et al. 2006 (Abstract)

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?db=pubmed&

cmd=Retrieve&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=16962663

Ferreira et al. 2006 Ultra high frequency electromagnetic field irradiation during pregnancy leads to an increase in erythrocytes micronuclei incidence in rat offspring

http://www.avaate.org/IMG/pdf/paper_amancio.pdf full study

xx http://www.chrc-ccdp.ca/pdf/envsensitivity_en.pdf, see p.46 for Electromagnetic radiation and fields

xxvii http://www.fnf.org.uk/chact/chact3.htm , Children’s Act, Part 3, Section 17

xxx Goldsworthy email to Bioelectromagnetic Society after his Newsnight Interview 4 May 2007:-

http://www.electrosensitivity.org.uk/thisweek.htm

"Hello All,

I was asked as a scientist to give a recorded interview for a BBC "Newsnight" programme on the safety of Wi-Fi in schools. I was subjected to hostile questioning (which I expected) but I was surprised to find that they were not at all interested in the science. The official line in the UK seems to be that there are no known mechanisms that can explain any deleterious effects on health and they would prefer not to have their views disturbed by scientific facts.

When I pointed out in the interview that there was now firm scientific evidence of serious effects on health and fertility from mobile phones (which share similar technologies with Wi-Fi) and some of this could be related to experimentally proven damage to DNA, the interview was brought to an abrupt end. I was escorted politely to my waiting taxi and advised that very little of the interview would be broadcast.

Instead the bulk of the science slot in the programme was given over to "scientists" offering soothing words about how little danger Wi-Fi presented because the signal level was lower than that from mobile phones. But to say that Wi-Fi is safe just because the signal is lower than that from mobile phones is meaningless unless they can also specify what a safe level is, and they have not established this. Despite this serious omission, they went on to say that any research to discover the health risks from Wi-Fi "should be given a very low priority.

So there we have it, it is down to our non-consenting children to act as guinea pigs to test the technology in the class room. The proposal by Lawrie Challis that the effects on their health may be monitored offers no comfort to their parents.

If anyone reading this wants to have a more detailed scientific explanation of how weak electromagnetic fields affect living organisms, it can be found at tinyurl . It is free for any member of the public to download and copy as many times as they want.

Best wishes

Andrew"

xl Opening of the blood brain barrier http://omega.twoday.net/20061116/

xliii http://news.independent.co.uk/health/article2586675.ece

 xliv Defence Intelligence Agency. Biological effects of electromagnetic radiation (radiowaves and microwaves) – Eurasian Communist Countries. DST-1810S-074-76, March 1976